1. Real decision and initial plan
Promote the bounded Decisagent v0.9 release
- Accountable owner
- Decisagent accountable product owner
- Initial Codex role
- Codex implemented, qualified, proposed, and—only after exact accountable approval—performed the bounded release.
- Planned authority
- Human approved action
Gaps frozen before Assurance
- No Decision Assurance Case or exact case-hash approval existed for the release.
- Rollback and authority revocation had not been rehearsed through the release evidence path.
- Terminal support delivery and independent settlement observation were unproven.
2. Fit and accepted Decision Design
- Fit posture
- Conditional fit
- Recommended capability
- DA-4 capability ceiling
- Accepted authority ceiling
- Human approved action
The decision object is the externally meaningful choice described above. Evidence assembly, recommendation, human authorization, external execution, and observed outcome are separate stages and records.
3. Implementation Pack and material effects
The generated Pack v2 handoff governed exact-source evidence return, gate identities, settlement separation, rollback/revocation, and the no-impersonation approval boundary.
- Canonical promotion was changed from delegated release work into a hash-bound HUMAN_APPROVED_ACTION decision.
- A strict implementation receipt and exact-head/provider/support evidence closure became release prerequisites.
- Rollback, authority revocation, independent settlement observation, and an immutable expected-versus-actual review became explicit controls.
4. Implementation evidence and accountable acceptance
The implementation agent returned an exact-source receipt with 13 passing gate observations. Those observations did not accept their own gates.
- Agent-observed passing tests did not accept their own gates or grant operating authority.
- The implementation receipt did not establish canonical settlement or business outcome.
An accountable human separately accepted 16 gates and released Human approved action only for this scope:
Promote the exact approved v0.9 implementation source to Decisagent canonical Sites and commerce, observe settlement/outcome, and publish only the redacted receipt-only reference closeout within this case.
5. External settlement
External effect confirmed was recorded after independent observation of the canonical state.
- The exact approved source was live on the canonical Decisagent public surface.
- The Decision Assurance workspace and prior Fit, Design, export, and accepted-profile routes returned their intended public behavior.
- Candidate slugs remained unavailable and public synthesis remained disabled.
- The dedicated commerce runtime reported healthy Pack v2 configuration while preserving v1 fulfillment compatibility.
- The canonical Sites runtime had no provider secret or research-database binding.
- Robots, sitemap, and bounded crawler probes remained healthy before the receipt-only closeout.
Limits
- Provider acknowledgements were not treated as settlement until canonical HTTP and runtime behavior were observed independently.
- This receipt does not establish customer adoption, commercial value, or a successful longer-horizon business outcome.
6. Initial expected-versus-actual review
Original expectation
Capture the original expectation and compare it with the observed outcome at the decision and immediately after execution.
Actual observed state
The v0.9 Decision Assurance workflow, prior Fit and Design paths, free exports, accepted-only intelligence, and Pack v2 commerce were reachable in the bounded post-deployment window; the intended authority gate remained enforced and no critical regression was observed.
- Comparator
- Record a pre-decision expected range and compare it with the actual outcome using the same objective definitions.
- Conclusion
- Improved
- Attribution confidence
- Medium
Still unknown
- No external customer has yet completed a Decision Assurance Case.
- The bounded initial window does not establish long-term reliability, adoption, support load, or commercial value.
- The 4–6 week market-learning observation and its longer-horizon outcome review remain due.
Longer-horizon review due: 2026-10-13.