DecisagentAbout

Aera Technology

Aera Decision Cloud™

EXPLICIT DECISION AGENTOfficial product site ↗

What does this record establish?

Human-reviewed claims and the capability matrix below describe the exact accepted scope. Vendor-documented capability, an independent test, and proven behavior in your implementation are different evidence states.

Before choosing a product, define your own decision, evidence requirements, and authority boundary. Free Fit can produce that reviewable basis without selecting a vendor.

Assess your decision first

See a synthetic Fit and Design result →

Decision Agent capability level

DA-4Decision-Action Agent

Why

At the exact Decision Cloud, Inbox, and named decision-skills configuration scope, current first-party documentation establishes a named supplier-selection decision, multi-system evidence assembly, explicit analyzed alternatives, recommendations, business-rule constraints, an inspectable decision/context/action/outcome history, transactional action, and per-decision execution modes with distinct approval-based and predefined-constraint authority paths. The sources do not establish an inspectable governed update with promotion and rollback, so the evidence ceiling remains DA-4.

This level describes accepted evidence of capability at the stated scope. It is not a quality score, recommendation, operational assurance result, or permission to operate at that authority.

Capability matrix

CriterionAssessmentEvidence
Named decisionThe classified scope has a first-class, externally meaningful decision object.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Evidence assemblyThe scope assembles evidence relevant to that named decision.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Gap detectionThe scope identifies missing, conflicting, or insufficient evidence.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Explicit alternativesThe decision alternatives are first-class and externally meaningful.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Alternatives evaluatedThe scope compares those alternatives rather than internal model or tool choices.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Recommendation producedThe comparison produces a recommendation, decision, or justified abstention.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Explicit objectivesDecision objectives are represented explicitly.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Explicit constraintsDecision constraints or policies are represented explicitly.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Explicit uncertaintyMaterial uncertainty or confidence is represented explicitly.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Decision traceThe decision process produces an inspectable or reproducible trace.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Decision-service executionThe scope can execute a decision computation or expose its result through an API.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
External operational actionThe scope can cause a consequential external operational effect.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Policy-bound executionExternal action is explicitly pre-authorized by a bounded policy.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Action-time human approvalExternal action requires a recorded human approval at action time.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Execution mode and scopeThe acting mode, allowed actions, and operational scope are explicit.SUPPORTED1 reviewed claim
Override or exception pathAn override, escalation, exception, or stop path is explicit.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Originating decision identityThe originating decision/action has a persistent identity.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Downstream outcome observedA downstream operational or real-world outcome is observed.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Outcome attributed to decisionThe outcome is correlated or attributed to the originating decision/action.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Expected versus actualExpected results are compared with observed results.UNKNOWNNo public evidence
Governed update to later decisionsThe comparison causes an inspectable, bounded update to a later decision process.UNKNOWNNo public evidence

Operational assurance interpretation

This view reorganizes the accepted capability matrix to expose assurance-relevant gaps. It does not assess any specific deployment, prove controls, or replace a Decision Assurance Case.

Decision completeness

EVIDENCED

Whether accepted evidence establishes the named decision, its alternatives, their evaluation, and the resulting recommendation or abstention.

Evidence readiness

PARTIAL

Whether accepted capability evidence establishes both evidence assembly and material gap or conflict detection.

Governance/control readiness

PARTIAL

Whether accepted evidence establishes explicit decision objectives, constraints, uncertainty, and a reproducible decision trace.

Authority/control readiness

PARTIAL

Whether accepted capability evidence establishes the action, its exact authority mode and scope, and an override or stop path.

Outcome closure

UNKNOWN

Whether accepted evidence closes the loop from originating decision identity through observed and attributed outcome to governed later update.

Validation basis

UNKNOWN

No Decisagent independent evaluation establishes implementation assurance for this accepted scope.

Create an implementation-specific Decision Assurance Case →

Reviewed decision support

  • Pricing

    DIRECTLY SUPPORTED · Within the exact Decision Cloud, Inbox, and named-skills configuration, Aera's Price Optimization Skill analyzes named market and customer evidence, balances revenue, margin, and competitive objectives, recommends pricing adjustments, and documents real-time channel updates.

  • Supplier Selection

    DIRECTLY SUPPORTED · Within the exact Decision Cloud, Inbox, and named-skills configuration, Aera's Best Supplier Selection Skill evaluates price, lead time, performance, and risk; recommends an optimal supplier mix; and documents supplier-selection and related workflow action.

Material evidence

These are the human-reviewed, scope-bound facts supporting this classification. Evidence posture describes the source basis; it is not an endorsement or independent test.

Open questions

  • Gap detection: UNKNOWN
  • Explicit objectives: UNKNOWN
  • Explicit uncertainty: UNKNOWN
  • Decision-service execution: UNKNOWN
  • Override or exception path: UNKNOWN
  • Originating decision identity: UNKNOWN
  • Downstream outcome observed: UNKNOWN
  • Outcome attributed to decision: UNKNOWN
  • Expected versus actual: UNKNOWN
  • Governed update to later decisions: UNKNOWN

Independent evaluation

Not independently tested by Decisagent.

Revision history

  1. Revision 16 ·
  2. Revision 15 ·

Report a correction or updated evidence →